What is Design for Manufacturing (DFM)?

Design for Manufacturing (DFM) is the practice of shaping parts and products so they are feasible to make and cost-effective to produce. DFM works best early in development, when changes are inexpensive and impact is highest.

Why is Design for Manufacturing important?

Most lifecycle cost is committed during design. Early DFM reduces rework, avoids manufacturability risks, and enables fact-based sourcing and supplier negotiations.

What are common DFM principles?

Simplify geometry; standardize materials and features; design to process constraints (draft, bend radii); relax tolerances where possible; minimize secondary operations; pair with DFA.

How does DFM relate to DFMA?

DFM focuses on part-level feasibility and cost; DFA focuses on assembly structure and labor. DFMA combines both to minimize total product cost.

Which processes does DFM cover?

Machining; sheet metal; injection molding; multiple casting methods; forging; powdered metallurgy; extrusion; welding/joining; PCB fabrication and assembly; manual and automatic assembly.

Design for Manufacturing (DFM)

Updated September 15, 2025

What is Design for Manufacturing?

Design for Manufacturing (DFM) shapes parts and products so they are feasible to make and cost-effective to produce. Applying DFM early exposes manufacturability risks and cost drivers—so teams can iterate when changes are inexpensive and impact is highest.

Goals of Design for Manufacturing (DFM)

Hit design-to-cost targets with transparent trade-offs
Prevent late rework by catching manufacturability risks early
Reduce cycle time, setups, and secondary operations
Standardize materials/features to simplify supply and quality
Align engineering, manufacturing, and sourcing on one cost model

Design for Manufacturing Principles

Simplify geometry to reduce passes, setups, and tooling complexity.
Standardize materials, features, fasteners, and finishes.
Design to the process (draft for molding, bend radii for sheet metal, fillets for casting flow).
Relax tolerances where function allows; avoid tight finish over large areas.
Minimize secondary ops via early trade-offs and feature choices.
Pair with DFA to reduce part count and assembly labor.

Design for Manufacturing Example (Micro-Case)

Part: Aluminum bracket (milled)

Change: Increase internal corner radius from 1 mm → 3 mm; add 1° draft to deep pocket; loosen surface finish on non-mating face.

Modeled impact (example):

Tool passes ↓ (fewer small-tool paths), cycle time ↓ ~12–18%
Tool wear ↓; finish op dropped on one face
Estimated piece-part cost ↓ ~9–14% at 10k/yr volume

Note: Illustrative example—actual results vary by geometry, process, rates, and volumes.

Example of cost-driver visibility in a DFM study

DFM makes cycle time, setup, tooling, and secondary-operation drivers visible—so design changes are targeted and defensible.

Manufacturing Processes Covered

Machining (milling, turning, drilling, grinding)
Sheet metal (laser/punch, press brake, stamping)
Injection molding (plastics & metals)
Metal casting (die, sand, investment, permanent mold, gravity, pressure)
Forging & Powdered metallurgy
Extrusion (metal & plastic)
Welding & joining (manual & robotic)
PCB fabrication & assembly
Manual & automatic assembly

DFM vs. DFA vs. DFMA®

Discipline	Primary focus	Typical questions	Outcome
DFM	Part-level feasibility & cost	Which process & parameters minimize piece-part cost while meeting spec?	Optimized geometry, tolerances, materials, routings
DFA	Assembly structure & labor	What parts can be eliminated or combined to cut handling/fastening?	Lower part count, faster builds, fewer fasteners
DFMA®	Total product cost	What architecture and part designs minimize total cost?	System-level savings that avoid local optimizations

How to Implement Design for Manufacturing (DFM)

Start with intent. Define function, risk, loads, volumes, and target cost.
Screen processes. Compare machining, sheet metal, molding, casting, etc.
Parameterize. Materials, wall thickness, draft, radii, finishes, tolerances.
Expose cost drivers. Cycle time, setup, tooling, scrap, secondary ops, overhead.
Iterate to target. Adjust geometry/spec to hit design-to-cost without sacrificing function.
Close with DFA. Reduce parts and handling to capture system-level savings.

Explore DFM Concurrent Costing Talk to an engineer

Global Manufacturing Profiles

Compare the same design across countries and processes to understand how labor, overhead, tooling, and cycle times shift cost structure—supporting sourcing, reshoring, and supplier diversification decisions.

Request a walkthrough See DFMA® platform

Design for Manufacturing: FAQ

When should we start applying DFM?

During concept and embodiment design—when changes are fast and inexpensive. You influence most lifecycle cost before drawings are released.

Does Design for Manufacturing replace supplier quotes?

No. DFM accelerates iterations and makes supplier conversations more productive by revealing the why behind the number before RFQs.

What’s the best way to combine DFM and DFA?

Run DFM on cost-critical parts, then run DFA to eliminate parts and reduce assembly labor. DFMA® aligns both to minimize total cost.

Where can I learn more?

See DFM Concurrent Costing, DFA, and our customer stories.

Ready to Design Cost Out?

See how DFMA® makes manufacturability transparent and cost trade-offs obvious—before release.

Discover	Learn	BDI Info	Follow Us
Software	Studies	About BDI
Solutions	Webinars	Contact
Training	News	Directions
Services	Papers	Agents
Support	Forum	Partners

DFMA® Software and Services | Boothroyd Dewhurst, Inc.