For engineering and sourcing leaders evaluating DFMA, this calculator splits ROI into three levers that share a simple scope: DFMA Product Simplification, Should-Costing, and Engineering productivity.
Effort size presets set software, training, projects per year, and typical purchased-part scope for simplification. Savings presets only change the savings percentages (how conservative vs aggressive you are).
Small: roughly 1–2 DFMA projects/year, up to ~40 purchased parts in scope.
Medium: about 3–5 projects/year, ~40–120 purchased parts.
Large: 5+ projects/year, 120+ purchased parts and/or multi-site or global rollout.
Scope & baseline (shared across levers)
Capture one-time engineering, change, and IT effort needed to implement DFMA redesigns and deploy the software. These roll into Year 1 cost so the ROI reflects “is it really worth the effort?”.
Total NRE (one-time): $0
Uses DFMA as a should-cost baseline on purchased parts. Split parts into simple (≈15–30 min analyses) and complex (≈1–2 hour analyses) to reflect the engineering effort behind the savings.
Small should-costing initiative: roughly one or two key suppliers or commodities, ~45 parts/year in scope.
Medium: several suppliers or product families, just over 100 parts/year in scope.
Large program: multi-commodity or multi-site backbone for negotiations, roughly 200+ parts/year in scope.
Should-cost analysis workload: 0.0 hours/year.
Captures engineering hours saved and avoided tooling changes when DFMA shifts work earlier in the development process.
Calculation: (projects × hours × rate × capture%) + (tooling changes × cost per change).
The discount rate is used to calculate 3-year NPV. Savings escalation (inflation) increases savings each year in the 5-year chart.
We’ll discuss ROI for your scope and demonstrate how DFMA helps you achieve it.